Civil Procedure — Learning Pathway
About this pathway
Three progressive tracks. Start at Beginner even if you have prior knowledge — use it to confirm foundations before advancing.
Each track builds on the previous one. Linked to Civil_Procedure_Master_Guide and Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards.
Track 1 — Beginner: Foundations
Goal: Understand the structure of civil procedure and the key vocabulary.
Week 1 — The Framework
Read: Civil_Procedure_Master_Guide#General Introduction
Key concepts to master:
- - [ ] What is civil procedure? How does it differ from substantive law?
- - [ ] The four-stage structure (Before → Litigation → After → Additional)
- - [ ] The court hierarchy (Magistrates' Courts → High Court → SCA → Constitutional Court)
- - [ ] Impact of the Constitution on procedure
Self-test questions:
- 01What is the difference between substantive law and adjectival law?
- 02Name the four stages of civil procedure.
- 03What is the monetary jurisdiction of the District Magistrates' Court?
- 04Which section of the Constitution guarantees access to courts?
Week 2 — Stage One: Before You Sue
Read: Civil_Procedure_Master_Guide#Stage One — Before Litigation
Key concepts to master:
- - [ ] Cause of Action — definition and four common types
- - [ ] Locus Standi — two requirements; s 38 extension
- - [ ] Magistrates' Court jurisdiction — monetary limits, s 29
- - [ ] FOLI Rule — calculating time periods
- - [ ] Court days vs calendar days distinction
Self-test questions:
- 01What are the elements of a delictual cause of action?
- 02What is the monetary limit of the Regional Magistrates' Court?
- 03Apply the FOLI rule: summons served Monday 1st; defendant has 10 court days to defend — what is the deadline (assume no public holidays)?
- 04When does the Organs of State Act require notice before litigation? How long?
Week 3 — Stage One: Demand, Service, Action or Application
Read: Civil_Procedure_Master_Guide#Stage One — Part 2 Pre-Litigation Issues
Key concepts to master:
- - [ ] When is a demand required?
- - [ ] Methods of service (HC rule 4)
- - [ ] Difference between substituted service and edictal citation
- - [ ] Action vs application decision
Self-test questions:
- 01Name three situations where a demand is legally required before suing.
- 02When must you use edictal citation instead of substituted service?
- 03What is the Plascon-Evans rule?
- 04If there is a genuine dispute of fact in application proceedings, what can the court do?
Week 4 — Stage Two: Applications
Read: Civil_Procedure_Master_Guide#Stage Two — Part 1 Applications
Key concepts to master:
- - [ ] 10-step on notice application procedure
- - [ ] Ex parte applications — duty of utmost good faith
- - [ ] Rule nisi — what it is and how it works
- - [ ] Urgent applications — HC rule 6(12)
Self-test questions:
- 01How many court days does a respondent have to file a notice of intention to oppose in the High Court?
- 02What happens if an applicant fails to disclose a material fact in an ex parte application?
- 03What is a rule nisi?
- 04What factors does a court consider for urgency under rule 6(12)?
Week 5 — Stage Two: Actions and Pleadings
Read: Civil_Procedure_Master_Guide#Stage Two — Part 2 Actions
Key concepts to master:
- - [ ] The five basic pleading steps
- - [ ] Types of summons
- - [ ] Pleadings time periods (10/20/15 HC; 10/20/10 MC)
- - [ ] Automatic bar — when it operates and how to remove it
- - [ ] Exception — two grounds
Self-test questions:
- 01What must particulars of claim always contain? (5 elements)
- 02What is the time limit to file a plea in the High Court after delivering a notice to defend?
- 03Name the two grounds for taking an exception.
- 04What is the difference between an exception and an application to strike out?
Beginner Checkpoint — Self-Assessment
Before moving to Track 2, confirm you can:
- [ ] Draw the four-stage mind map from memory
- [ ] State monetary limits for both levels of Magistrates' Courts
- [ ] Apply the FOLI rule to a given date
- [ ] List the five basic pleading steps and their time periods
- [ ] Distinguish action from application in a given scenario
Track 2 — Intermediate: Application and Analysis
Goal: Apply procedural rules to fact scenarios; identify procedural pathways; spot traps.
Module 1 — Jurisdiction Problems
Scenarios to work through:
Scenario A: A owe B R180 000 from a contract concluded in Johannesburg. A lives in Pretoria and works in Sandton. B wants to sue. Which courts have jurisdiction? Answer: Both District MC (Johannesburg/Pretoria/Sandton) and High Court (Gauteng Division). MC is under the R200 000 limit. The cause of action arose in Johannesburg (wholly) → that MC has s 28(1)(d) jurisdiction. A's residence (Pretoria) and work (Sandton) → those MCs have s 28(1)(a) jurisdiction. High Court: ratione rei gestae (Johannesburg) + ratione domicilii (Pretoria). B may choose. Scenario B: B wants to sue for R250 000 arising from the same contract. Options? Answer: MC has jurisdiction up to R200 000 only. B must sue in the High Court unless B abandons the excess R50 000 (s 38 MCA). Or B splits into two claims — but only if they are genuinely separate causes of action (s 40 prohibits artificial splitting). Scenario C: C, a foreigner not in South Africa, owes D money. D wants to sue in the High Court. Answer: No arrest to found jurisdiction (abolished by Bid Industrial Holdings). D needs: consent to jurisdiction; OR C has assets in the court's area (attachment to confirm jurisdiction remains available for money claims in limited circumstances). Check if C has any local connection — domicile, residence, business operations.
Module 2 — Choosing and Drafting the Correct Procedure
Decision tree practice:
Is there a real dispute of fact?
├── YES → Use ACTION procedure (summons)
│ ↓
│ What type of claim?
│ ├── Liquid document / liquidated amount → Simple summons or Provisional sentence summons
│ └── Complex/unliquidated claim → Combined summons
│
└── NO (or primarily law question) → Use APPLICATION procedure (notice of motion)
↓
Is it urgent?
├── YES → Rule 6(12) urgent application
└── NO → Is it ex parte or on notice?
├── Ex parte → Comply with uberrima fides requirement
└── On notice → 10-step procedurePractice tasks:
- - [ ] Draft the prayer section for a combined summons for breach of contract
- - [ ] Draft the supporting affidavit for an urgent application
- - [ ] Identify whether to use ex parte or on notice application for: (a) an Anton Piller order; (b) an interdict against a striking worker; (c) an application for default judgment
Module 3 — Pleadings and Responses
Advanced analysis:
Scenario: Defendant receives a combined summons. The particulars of claim state "the plaintiff suffered damages of R150 000" but do not specify the nature of the damages or how they were calculated. What can the defendant do?
Options:
- 01Exception — argue the POC is vague and embarrassing (cannot plead meaningfully)
- 02Request for further particulars (HC rule 35(12) / MC rule 23(13)) — before pleading, ask for clarification
- 03Simply plead — take the risk that the claim may succeed/fail on the merits
Best answer: File a notice of exception within 10 court days (HC) after delivering notice to defendant. State the nature of the vagueness and invite plaintiff to remove it within 10 court days. If plaintiff fails, proceed with the exception.
Practice tasks:
- - [ ] Work through summary judgment — when can a plaintiff apply, what must the defendant do to resist it?
- - [ ] Work through default judgment — when does it arise, how is it rescinded?
- - [ ] Apply the HC rule 28 amendment procedure to a scenario where plaintiff wants to add a new head of damages after close of pleadings
Module 4 — Pre-Trial to Trial
Key procedural sequences:
Discovery deep-dive:
- - When: after close of pleadings / after notice to discover
- - What: ALL relevant documents (possessed, controlled, or in custody)
- - How: discovery affidavit → list (including privilege claims) → inspection
- - Trap: failure to discover = document inadmissible at trial (HC rule 35(4))
Pre-trial conference — rule 37 minute:
- - Identifies issues agreed / in dispute
- - Binds parties at trial
- - Non-compliance → cost sanction
Expert evidence — HC rule 36(9):
- - Must exchange summaries of expert evidence before trial
- - Failure → expert may not testify
Practice task: Trace all pre-trial steps from close of pleadings to trial for a contested personal injury claim.
Module 5 — After Litigation: Appeals and Execution
Appeals pathway:
Magistrates' Court judgment
↓
Apply for leave to appeal to the Magistrates' Court
↓ (if refused)
Petition to High Court for leave
↓ (if refused)
Petition to SCA (special leave)
↓
Appeal heard in the High Court / SCAExecution analysis:
- - After judgment → wait for execution → apply for writ/warrant
- - Constitutional trap: execution against a home requires proportionality analysis (s 26)
- - Debtor cannot pay? → Section 65 procedure
Intermediate Checkpoint
Before moving to Track 3, confirm you can:
- [ ] Solve a jurisdiction problem for both MC and HC
- [ ] Choose the correct procedure (action/application) and type of summons for a given scenario
- [ ] Trace the full pleadings sequence including time periods
- [ ] Identify when summary judgment / default judgment is available
- [ ] Explain discovery obligations and consequences of non-disclosure
- [ ] Trace the appeal route from MC to SCA
Track 3 — Advanced: Problem-Solving and Exam Mastery
Goal: Handle complex multi-issue problems; write exam answers under time pressure; apply constitutional dimensions.
Advanced Module 1 — Complex Jurisdiction Problems
Multi-court, multi-defendant scenarios:
Problem: Three defendants. D1 lives in Cape Town, D2 in Johannesburg, D3 is a foreign national temporarily in Durban. The contract was concluded in Durban and performance is due in Cape Town. The claim is R500 000.
Analysis:
- - MC jurisdiction: R500 000 > R400 000 → no MC jurisdiction even with consent
- - High Court required
- - Plaintiff must choose the division: Western Cape (D1 domicile / performance); Gauteng (D2 domicile); KwaZulu-Natal (where contract concluded, ratione rei gestae + D3's current presence)
- - For D3 (foreign peregrinus): no arrest to found jurisdiction; need consent or attachment of assets
- - If any division has jurisdiction over D1 or D2 → that court can also summon D3 if a nexus exists
Advanced Module 2 — Integrated Problem Solving
Full procedure trace — exam technique:
Problem: Your client, a company, is owed R180 000 on a written acknowledgement of debt. The debtor has not paid. Advise on the full procedural pathway from instruction to enforcement.
Model answer structure:
- 01Cause of action — liquid document (written AOD, fixed sum)
- 02Locus standi — company can sue; ensure authorised representative signs papers
- 03Jurisdiction — R180 000 ≤ R200 000 → District MC has jurisdiction; or HC
- 04Demand — send letter of demand (may not be legally required but good practice; NCA may require s 129 notice first)
- 05Pre-litigation — check if NCA applies; if so, send s 129 notice and wait 10 business days
- 06Procedure choice — liquid document → either: (a) combined/simple summons action; or (b) provisional sentence summons (faster)
- 07If provisional sentence:
- - Issue provisional sentence summons
- - Serve on debtor
- - Debtor may appear and oppose within period
- - If no opposition → court grants provisional sentence
- - Debtor has 3 months to bring principal case (action in conventional form)
- 08If action:
- - Issue summons + POC
- - Serve via sheriff
- - Debtor has 10 court days to note intention to defend
- - If no defence: apply for default judgment (simple summons)
- - If summary judgment applies: apply under rule 32/14
- 09Enforcement — writ/warrant of execution; sheriff attaches and sells movables first; if insufficient → immovables (s 26 analysis required)
- 10If debtor has no assets → s 65 procedure or administration order
Advanced Module 3 — Constitutional Dimensions
Must-know constitutional issues in civil procedure:
| Issue | Constitutional principle | Case |
|---|---|---|
| Access to courts | s 34 — right to a hearing | Various |
| Marital status in summons | s 9 — equality | Nedcor Bank v Hennop |
| Execution against a home | s 26 — housing right | Jaftha v Schoeman; Gundwana v Steko |
| Arrest tanquam | Abolished — dignity/liberty | Malachi v Cape Dance Academy |
| Provisional sentence | s 25 / fair trial | Twee Jonge Gezellen v Land Bank |
| Extended locus standi | s 38 — Bill of Rights access | Various class actions |
| Arrest to found jurisdiction | Abolished | Bid Industrial Holdings v Strang |
Exam strategy: In any procedure problem touching on organs of state, a home, a fundamental right, or a foreign party — always flag the constitutional dimension, even if you then proceed with the standard procedural answer.
Advanced Module 4 — Stage Four Mastery
Interdict problem-solving:
Problem: Client wants to prevent a competitor from using a similar trade name. What type of interdict? What must client prove?
Analysis:
- - Nature: prohibitory interdict (prevent future act)
- - Likely seeking interim interdict (urgently, before campaign starts) + possible final interdict
- - For interim: prima facie right (IP/trade name right), well-grounded apprehension of irreparable harm (loss of reputation/goodwill is irreparable), balance of convenience (preventing confusion > inconveniencing defendant), no other adequate remedy
- - For final: clear right (established IP right), injury (actual use = injury already committed), no other adequate remedy
- - Procedure: urgent ex parte application for interim order; set down for return date for confirmation/discharge
Anton Piller + Spoliation combined problem:
- - If competitor has obtained confidential documents + is using them: consider Anton Piller (to search and seize documents) + interdict (to prevent ongoing use)
- - If client's physical property was removed without consent: mandament van spolie first (restore possession) → ownership/rights dispute later
Advanced Module 5 — Exam Technique
Structuring a civil procedure exam answer:
1. IDENTIFY THE PROCEDURAL ISSUE (1-2 sentences)
"The question raises issues of [jurisdiction/locus standi/pleadings/etc.]"
2. STATE THE APPLICABLE RULE/SECTION
"In terms of [HC rule X / s Y of the MCA / common law principle]..."
3. APPLY THE RULE TO THE FACTS
"On the facts, [defendant/plaintiff] [satisfies/fails to satisfy] the requirements because..."
4. REACH A CONCLUSION
"Therefore, [the court has/lacks] jurisdiction / [the exception will/will not] succeed..."
5. NOTE CONSTITUTIONAL DIMENSION (if applicable)
"Note also the constitutional dimension: s [X] of the Constitution requires..."Common exam errors to avoid:
- - [ ] Confusing court days and calendar days
- - [ ] Applying HC rules to a MC problem (or vice versa)
- - [ ] Forgetting that jurisdiction = type of court + territorial (two separate questions)
- - [ ] Not identifying whether a dispute of fact exists before choosing action/application
- - [ ] Ignoring the FOLI rule when calculating deadlines
- - [ ] Treating service and jurisdiction as the same thing
- - [ ] Forgetting that locus standi and capacity to litigate are separate requirements
- - [ ] Not considering whether the NCA/CPA applies (especially for credit agreements and consumer goods)
Advanced Checkpoint — Final Self-Assessment
You are exam-ready when you can:
- [ ] Solve a multi-party, multi-court jurisdiction problem in full
- [ ] Advise on the complete procedural pathway from instruction to enforcement for any standard claim
- [ ] Identify all constitutional dimensions in a procedure problem
- [ ] Write a structured exam answer applying the 5-step format
- [ ] Distinguish between all Stage Four procedures (interdict vs Anton Piller vs spoliation vs provisional sentence) and select the correct one for a given scenario
- [ ] Apply the Plascon-Evans, Setlogelo, Colman v Dunbar, and Gordon Lloyd Page tests correctly
Quick-Reference: Knowledge Card Cross-Links
| Card | Topic | Track | |
|---|---|---|---|
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 1 | 1]] | Cause of Action | Beginner |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 2 | 2]] | Locus Standi | Beginner |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 3 | 3]] | Curator Ad Litem vs Curator Bonis | Beginner |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 4 | 4]] | MC Monetary Jurisdiction | Beginner |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 5 | 5]] | MC Territorial Jurisdiction | Intermediate |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 6 | 6]] | HC Grounds of Jurisdiction | Intermediate |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 7 | 7]] | FOLI Rule | Beginner |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 8 | 8]] | Service Methods (HC) | Beginner |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 9 | 9]] | Action vs Application | Beginner |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 10 | 10]] | Types of Summons | Intermediate |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 11 | 11]] | Pleadings Time Periods | Beginner |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 12 | 12]] | Exception | Intermediate |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 13 | 13]] | Summary Judgment | Intermediate |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 14 | 14]] | Default Judgment | Intermediate |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 15 | 15]] | Discovery | Intermediate |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 16 | 16]] | Pre-Trial Conference | Intermediate |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 17 | 17]] | Absolution from the Instance | Advanced |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 18 | 18]] | Leave to Appeal | Advanced |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 19 | 19]] | Further Evidence on Appeal | Advanced |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 20 | 20]] | Review vs Appeal | Intermediate |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 21 | 21]] | Writ/Warrant of Execution | Intermediate |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 22 | 22]] | Section 65 Procedure | Advanced |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 23 | 23]] | Final vs Interim Interdict | Advanced |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 24 | 24]] | Anton Piller Order | Advanced |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 25 | 25]] | Provisional Sentence | Advanced |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 26 | 26]] | Spoliation Order | Advanced |
| [[Civil_Procedure_Knowledge_Cards#Card 27 | 27]] | Small Claims Court | Intermediate |
Last updated: 2026-06-18 | Based on: Civil Procedure: A Practical Guide, 3rd Ed., 2016